Best Stick Vacuum Cleaner 

Shark’s lightweight vacuum keeps up with the Dyson for half the price

The Shark Rocket lightweight vacuum is just about as customizable as they come.

Error: AWS Access Key ID: AKIAI54OHKABWJRLNUXQ. You are submitting requests too quickly. Please retry your requests at a slower rate.

No products available OR Your Access ID is not registered as an Amazon Associate.

Related posts

14 Thoughts to “Shark’s lightweight vacuum keeps up with the Dyson for half the price”

  1. dtz1000

    If the shark is corded then what the hell are you doing comparing it with a cordless vacuum? I can get a £30 corded that will be more powerful than a cordless but I still wouldn’t buy it because I hate having a stupid cord. Compare like with like next time, but you never do that because the british Dyson vacuum would utterly destroy the American shark cordless vacuum and that just wouldn’t do in America. Luckily others have made the comparison that shows what I say is true. Check out the Dyson V7 vs shark duoclean video. It shows how far ahead of Shark the Dyson cordless vacuums are.

  2. Darth Awar


  3. Rocking in a free world

    Stupid comparison when one is corded and the other is cordless.
    How can the shark clean the car when the car is not near the house? It cannot.
    Dyson wins hands down.

    1. Tom M

      Rocking in a free world, “Stupid comparison just like a stupid wee man you are.”. Just like someone who has nothing of value or substance to say, they always resort to juvenile name calling.

      So you like Dyson more than Shark….No one really gives a crap. Paying more for a product, does not always mean better quality

    2. Rocking in a free world

      David Altergott Jr .. Because my house is on a main road with no access to a garden or drive. Common sense if you think about it?

    3. David Altergott Jr

      Rocking in a free world
      why the hell would you be vaccuming your car on a main road LMAO

    4. Rocking in a free world

      rob p . Not possible when the car is over a main road. I cannot put a cord across the road.
      Besides . My comment says one is cordless and the other not. Stupid comparison just like a stupid wee man you are.

    5. rob p

      ever hear of an extension cord?

  4. Jonathan Holder

    CNET has really done a horrible job comparing the 2. First off, a cordless vacuum versus a corded one. They do not even bring the Dyson they are comparing to on the stage nor do they even using the shark as a working model. Sharks are known to burn out quickly while Dyson last for years. Owned the 2nd version of Dyson which is over 12+ years old and it still works perfectly to this day. I don’t see where the Shark keeps up with the Dyson at all. Poor showing of the actual title.

    1. Emmanuel J

      Not really. CNET did an excellent job. They showed the advantages & disadvantages of both machines. You may not have had issues with Dysons but generally they are not built very well. if you think Dyson are quality, you obviously havent tried a SEBO. Dyson maybe cordless and Shark has a cord but users are still limited by the poor battery life. The Shark can go on longer obviously!

    2. Wreck The System

      Annnnnnnnd You compared a new Shark Vacuum to a 12 year old Dyson. Brand names and build quality change over time. Dont be a slave to what a brand once was thats just stupid.

  5. Qasim Mir

    So CNET criticise the Dyson V6 but condone this crap?

    1. Emmanuel J

      They were providing a fair opinion based on their tests.

    2. Vacuum Central


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.